The last study tool you'll ever need.
RAD reads your casebook with you. Chat with any case, generate cue cards and mock exams from your readings, and look up any article of the Civil Code or Criminal Code in one click.Every answer cites its source.
Used by 2,000+ law students across Canada.
R. v. Oakes — [1986] 1 SCR 103
The onus of proving that a limitation on any Charter right is reasonable and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society rests upon the party seeking to uphold the limitation.
The party defending a Charter limit must prove it's a reasonable, justifiable restriction in a free and democratic society. This burden of proof flips the usual rule: instead of the citizen proving their right, the government has to defend its limit.
Trusted by 2,000+ law students at 55+ universities across Canada
Law school is a reading marathon.
We built RAD because we got tired of running it alone.
Cut your reading time in half. Upload, ask, get the gist.
Plain-English explanations of any passage, with the source cited.
Generate cue cards and mock exams from your own readings.
Talk to any case, statute, or judgment.
Upload a PDF and ask whatever you need: "What's the ratio decidendi? How does this compare to Oakes? Quiz me on the dissent." RAD answers in plain language and points you to the exact paragraph it pulled from.
- Attach multiple documents to one conversation
- Streaming answers in real time
- Ask about any article — RAD pulls it from the Civil Code, Criminal Code, or Charter mid-chat
- Drop in a screenshot of your prof's slides — RAD reads them too
- Save threads, rename them, come back when exam season hits
Both cases use the principles of fundamental justice as the s. 7 anchor — but Morgentaler treats them as procedural (access to abortion review), while Oakes is decided on s. 1 grounds rather than s. 7. Key contrast: Oakes establishes the proportionality test you'll apply to almost every Charter limit going forward.
AI that lives inside the document.
Highlight any passage. Four tools surface instantly. No tab-switching. No copy-paste. Just select and ask.
A breach of fiduciary duty arises where one party stands in a position of trust and confidence such that the law imposes an obligation of loyalty and good faith.
Some relationships (like lawyer–client or doctor–patient) put one person in charge of another's interests. The law says: don't betray that trust. If you do, you've breached your fiduciary duty.
Summary
The gist of the passage in 30 seconds.
Legal terms
Every concept defined inline — actus reus to volenti.
Explain
Rewrites the passage with everyday analogies your professor would never use.
Reformulate
Untangles a sentence so it actually makes sense the first time.
Every person has a duty to abide by the rules of conduct incumbent on him, according to the circumstances, usage or law, so as not to cause injury to another. Where he is endowed with reason and fails in this duty, he is liable for any injury he causes to another by such fault…
Foundation article for civil liability — three elements: fault, damage, causation. Cf. art. 1458 for contractual.
Every code. Every article. One click away.
Type an article number. Get the text, scenarios that bring it to life, and AI examples that show how it actually applies. Annotate any article with your own notes — color-coded, saved across sessions, ready for the exam.
- Search by article number or keyword
- Scenarios for every article of the Civil Code
- Highlight, note, color-code — Pro
- Cross-link articles to your own documents
Turn any reading into an exam.
Upload your week's readings, then click Generate cue cards or Generate practice exam. RAD pulls questions from the actual content you're being tested on — not generic flashcards from the internet.
Cue cards
12 / 24Flippable cards generated from your documents. Shuffle, restart, master the material.
Mock exam
Q 7 / 10Multiple-choice exams scored on the spot with a 'study weak areas' button.
Under s. 1 of the Charter, who carries the burden of justifying a rights infringement?
- The party challenging the law
- The Crown / state
- Either party, depending on the right
- The Supreme Court ex officio
Process your entire reading list at once.
Drop in twelve cases. Get twelve case briefs in under a minute. Or twelve sets of comprehension questions. Or twelve plain-English summaries. The hours you used to spend prepping just got compressed into a coffee break.
Quick actions
Summarize, define legal terms, explain, or reformulate — across many documents.
Case analysis
Extract the facts, issues, parties, and ratio of every case in one click.
Test your understanding
Generate Q&A for every document so you can quiz yourself across the whole syllabus.
- Oakes — case briefDone
- Morgentaler — case briefDone
- Hunter v. Southam — case briefDone
- Big M Drug Mart — case briefDone
- Edwards Books — case briefProcessing
Why students trust RAD.
Every answer cites.
Article numbers, paragraph anchors, click-to-jump. No hallucinated case names, no made-up paragraphs. If RAD says it, RAD shows you where.
Bilingual & bi-juridical.
Common law and droit civil. EN and FR. The only AI study tool built from the ground up for Canadian law school — not retrofitted.
Hosted in Canada.
Your readings stay in Canadian data centres. Sovereign, not sent to American servers, encrypted at rest.
Start free. Upgrade when exams hit.
No credit card to start. Cancel any time.
Free
Everything you need for daily reading.
Get started- Document viewer with highlighting & notes
- Chat with any single document
- Quick actions on selected text
- Full legislation viewer (CCQ, Criminal Code, Charter)
- Chrome extension to import any PDF
- Available in English and French
Pro
ProFor exam season. And the four months before it.
Start 3-day free trial- Everything in Free
- Standalone chat with multiple documents
- Cue cards & mock exams from your readings
- Bulk actions on up to 12 documents
- Annotations on every article of legislation
- Priority access to new AI models
Prices in CAD. Student plans available.
What law students are saying.
RAD changed how I prepare for class. I understand cases deeper and faster than ever before.
Honestly didn't think I'd be this into a study tool, but RAD literally saved me during finals. I can actually understand what's happening in these cases now instead of just memorizing the facts. 10/10 would recommend.
I was skeptical at first but this thing is actually insane. Like, I used to spend hours trying to figure out what a case was even saying, and now I can just… get it? Game changer for someone with ADHD trying to get through 100 pages of readings.
Questions, answered.
- Your readings stay in Canadian data centres, encrypted at rest. We don't train models on your documents. Your account is private — nothing you upload is visible to anyone else.
This semester, study smarter.
Free to start. No credit card. Two thousand law students can't be wrong.
Get started — it's free